| |
 |
Mixed propellant charge |
| RE30002 |
Mixed propellant charge
|
|
| Patent Drawings: | |
| Inventor: |
Dooley, et al. |
| Date Issued: |
May 22, 1979 |
| Application: |
05/819,795 |
| Filed: |
July 28, 1977 |
| Inventors: |
Cook; Ralph L. (Tallahassee, FL)
Dooley; James K. (Tallahassee, FL)
|
| Assignee: |
Olin Corporation (New Haven, CT) |
| Primary Examiner: |
Tudor; Harold J. |
| Assistant Examiner: |
|
| Attorney Or Agent: |
Jones; William W.Lerner; Paul J. |
| U.S. Class: |
102/288; 102/430; 149/2 |
| Field Of Search: |
102/38R; 102/40; 102/43; 102/DIG.1; 102/99; 102/100; 102/101; 102/102; 102/103; 102/104; 149/2; 149/21 |
| International Class: |
|
| U.S Patent Documents: |
389496; 1018312; 1709868; 2072671; 2124201; 2341310; 3377955; 3648616; 3706278 |
| Foreign Patent Documents: |
|
| Other References: |
|
|
| Abstract: |
A propellant charge comprising a matrix of granular propellant having interspersed therethrough compacted molded bodies of propellant. The density of the granular propellant is less than the density of the molded propellant bodies. The use of the mixed propellant charge enables a cartridge case of given dimensions to be loaded with a greater weight of propellant thereby enabling the achievement of greater projectile velocities in any given gun-ammunition system. |
| Claim: |
What is claimed is:
1. A propellant charge for use in a cartridge, said propellant charge comprising a first constituent of compacted nitrocellulose base smokeless powder .Iadd.formed in aplurality of bodies .Iaddend.and a second constituent of loose granular nitrocellulose base smokeless powder, .Iadd.said bodies of said first constituent being relatively homogeneously dispersed throughout said second constituent, .Iaddend.saidpropellant charge having a maximum packing density which is greater than about 1.0 gm/cc.
2. A propellant charge for use in a cartridge, said propellant charge comprising a plurality of compacted bodies of nitrocellulose base smokeless powder dispersed in a matrix of loose granular nitrocellulose base smokeless powder, saidpropellant charge having a maximum packing density which is greater than about 1.0 gm/cc.
3. A propellant charge for use in a cartridge, said propellant charge comprising a plurality of compacted bodies of nitrocellulose base smokeless powder substantially homogeneously dispersed throughout a matrix of loose granular nitrocellulosebase smokeless powder to form a mixture having a maximum packing density which is greater than about 1.0 gm/cc.
4. The propellant charge of claim 3, wherein the maximum packing density of said mixture is in the range of greater than about 1.0 gm/cc. to less than about 1.5 gm/cc.
5. A cartridge comprising a casing, a projectile in said casing, a primer, and a propellant charge disposed in a chamber within said casing, said propellant charge including a first portion of compacted nitrocellulose base smokeless powder.Iadd.formed in a plurality of bodies .Iaddend.and a second portion of loose granular nitrocellulose base smokeless powder, .Iadd.said bodies of said first portion being relatively homogeneously dispersed throughout said second portion, .Iaddend.saidpropellant charge having a maximum packing density within said casing chamber which is greater than about 1.0 gm/cc.
6. A cartridge comprising a casing, a projectile secured to said casing, a propellant chamber in said casing adjacent said projectile, and a propellant charge within said propellant chamber, said propellant charge including a plurality ofcompacted bodies of nitrocellulose base smokeless powder dispersed in a matrix of loose granular nitrocellulose base smokeless powder, and said propellant charge having a maximum packing density which is greater than about 1.0 gm/cc.
7. A cartridge comprising a casing, a projectile secured to said casing, a propellant chamber in said casing, and a propellant charge in said propellant chamber, said propellant charge comprising a plurality of molded bodies of nitrocellulosebase smokeless powder substantially evenly dispersed throughout a matrix of loose granular nitrocellulose base smokeless powder, said propellant charge having a maximum packing density of greater than about 1.0 gm/cc.
8. The cartridge of claim 7, wherein said propellant charge has a maximum packing density in the range of greater than about 1.0 gm/cc. to less than about 1.4 gm/cc. |
| Description: |
These and otherobjects and advantages of the invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a vertical sectional view of a cartridge loaded with the mixed propellant charge of this invention;
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of one of the molded slugs of propellant;
FIG. 3 is a plot of a representative pressure-time function produced by burning a conventional granular propellant charge; and
FIG. 4 is a graph showing pressure-velocity performance of conventional granular propellant charges as compared to the pressure-velocity performance of the mixed propellant charge of this invention.
Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2, thecartridge includes a casing 2 to which a projectile 4 is secured. The basal end wall 6 of the casing 2 is provided with a primer recess 8 in which a conventional primer cap 10 is positioned. A flash hole 12 extends from the primer recess 8 into theinterior propellant chamber 14 of the casing 2. The propellant which is packed into the propellant chamber 14 includes a plurality of molded high density slugs 16 of compacted smokeless powder which are relatively homogeneously dispersed throughout amatrix of loose granular smokeless powder 18. The slugs 16 are in the form of small platelets having flat side walls 20, rounded end walls 22, and flat top and bottom walls 24. While the slugs 16 are illustrated in the flat platelet geometric form, itwill be understood that the slugs can be made in other geometric shapes without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Referring now to FIG. 3, there is shown a characteristic plot of a pressure-time curve produced by burning a conventional granular smokeless powder propellant. As previously noted, peak pressure can be increased by burning a larger amount ofpropellant, and the time point where peak pressure is reached can be delayed by burning slower burning propellants. In each case, however, the general form of the curve remains the same, e.g. as shown in FIG. 3.
Referring now to FIG. 4, there are shown plots of the pressure-velocity performance of conventional granular charges of smokeless powder having various burning rates. The curves A-G are calculated for a neutral burning pure nitrocellulosepropellant in the granular form fired in a 30 mm WECOM system having no bore resistance and utilizing a 3,000 grain projectile. Curves A-G in FIG. 4 represent the performance of progressively slower burning all granular charges of conventional smokelesspowders, and curve H represents the performance of a mixed propellant charge formed in accordance with this invention. Curve H is calculated from actual firings with a 30 mm WECOM system having two inches of no bore resistance and a 3,000 grainprojectile.
Specifically, curve A represents the performance of a 338 grain charge (0.5 gm./cc. loading density) of a fast burning powder. It will be noted that this powder produces a quick rise in pressure without providing particularly high projectilevelocities. A projectile velocity of about 2340 is achieved at an undesirably-high chamber pressure of 70,000 psi. It is noted that an increase in the weight of the propellant charge used would merely increase the chamber pressure without significantlyincreasing the projectile velocity. Assuming that desirable chamber pressures are in the 30,000 to 40,000 psi range for this system, this propellant would only achieve projectile velocities of about 2160 fps to 2260 fps.
Curve B represents the performance of a slower burning granular powder charge of 405 grains (6 gm./cc. loading density). It will be noted that this powder, in the 30,000 to 40,000 psi range will produce projectile velocities of about 2220 fpsto about 2380 fps.
Curve C represents the performance of a slower burning granular powder charge of 473 grains (0.7 gm./cc. loading density). This powder, in the 30,000 to 40,000 psi range produces projectile velocities of about 2280 fps to about 2480 fps.
Curve D represents the performance of a slower burning granular powder charge of 540 grains (0.8 gm./cc. loading density). This powder, in the 30,000 to 40,000 psi range produces projectile velocities of about 2200 fps to about 2510 fps.
Curve E represents the performance of a slower burning granular powder charge of 608 grains (0.9 gm./cc. loading density). This powder, in the 30,000 to 40,000 psi range produces a projectile velocity of about 2100 fps to about 2420 fps.
Curve F represents the performance of a slower burning granular powder charge of 675 grains (1.0 gm./cc. loading density). This powder, in the 30,000 to 40,000 psi range produces a projectile velocity of about 2000 fps to about 2300 fps.
Curve G represents the theoretical performance of a slower burning granular powder charge of 775 grains (1.1476 gm./cc. loading density). This theoretical charge weight was chosen because it equals a charge weight made possible by the use ofthe mixed propellant of this invention. This propellant only produced a projectile velocity of 2080 fps at 40,000 psi chamber pressure.
Curve H represents the performance of the mixed propellant charge of this invention which has a burning rate that is about equal to the burning rate of the propellant of Curve C. The mixed propellant charge of Curve H contained 775 grains (1.1476gms./cc. loading density) of which 400 grains were in the form of compacted molded high density slugs, and 375 grains were in the granular form. The mixed propellant charge in the 30,000 to 40,000 psi range produced projectile velocities of about 2500fps to about 2700 fps. Thus it will be noted that the mixed propellant charge of this invention will produce a higher projectile velocity at any given pressure than will the purely granular propellant charges of the prior art at the same pressure. Furthermore, the higher projectile velocity will be produced without a dangerously high increase in chamber pressure.
Testing has demonstrated that projectile velocity can be increased while at the same time lowering chamber pressure by selecting for the molded slugs a geometrical form which provides an increased surface area to weight ratio. One suchgeometrical form which has been demonstrated as accomplishing this result is a cylindrical slug having end walls provided with conical depressions.
The mixed propellant charge of this invention can be composed of a mixture of compacted slugs of smokeless powder propellant dispersed throughout a matrix of granular smokeless powder propellant, wherein the propellants forming the slugs andmatrix are either the same or different propellants. The slugs may be coated completely or partially with a detergent, or may be uncoated. The slugs may be made in a great variety of different geometrical shapes. The granular matrix may bedeterrent-coated or uncoated.
Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that the use of a mixed propellant charge having a granular smokeless powder component and a compacted smokeless powder component will provide a given gun-ammunition system with an increasedprojectile velocity due to the increased cross-sectional bulk density of the mixed propellant charge as compared to a purely granular propellant charge. Also the use of a mixed propellant charge permits the system to be varied by several new parametersfor further tailoring of the system's performance. The two components may or may not be made of the same base propellant, and may or may not display the same ballistic characteristic. The two components may or may not be wholly or partially coated withcombustion varying deterrents. The ignition of the molded component probably occurs at some time interval after ignition of the granular component, it apparently requiring more energy to ignite the molded slugs than is required to ignite the granularpropellant, but once ignited, the molded slugs surprisingly burn in substantially the same manner as if they were in granular form.
Since many changes and variations of the disclosed embodiment of the invention may be made without departing from the inventive concept, it is not intended to limit the invention otherwise than as required by the appended claims.
* * * * * |
|
|
|
