Resources Contact Us Home
Browse by: INVENTOR PATENT HOLDER PATENT NUMBER DATE
 
 
Cranberry plant named `CNJ97-105-4`
PP19434 Cranberry plant named `CNJ97-105-4`
Patent Drawings:Drawing: PP19434-5    Drawing: PP19434-6    
« 1 »

(2 images)

Inventor: Vorsa
Date Issued: November 11, 2008
Application: 11/483,065
Filed: July 7, 2006
Inventors: Vorsa; Nicholi (Atco, NJ)
Assignee: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (New Brunswick, NJ)
Primary Examiner: Bell; Kent L
Assistant Examiner:
Attorney Or Agent: Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
U.S. Class: PLT/156
Field Of Search: PLT/156
International Class: A01H 5/00
U.S Patent Documents:
Foreign Patent Documents:
Other References:









Abstract: A new cranberry variety distinguished by significantly higher yields, higher anthocyanin content (red pigment), higher stolon vigor, and earlier flowering phenology.
Claim: I claim:

1. A new and distinct variety of cranberry plant, substantially as herein shown and described.
Description: Latin name of the genus andspecies of the plant claimed: Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.

Variety denomination: `CNJ97-105-4`.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a new American cranberry variety of distinctive lineage having significantly higher yields and stolon vigor, higher anthocyanin content (red pigment), and earlier flowering phenology, as compared to currentlycultivated commercial varieties known to the inventor. The new variety, `CNJ97-105-4`, was derived from a cross between `LeMunyon` (unpatented) and `#35` (unpatented), two varieties which are genetically distinct from the majority of cranberries inproduction today. As such, `CNJ97-105-4` offers growers an opportunity to increase the genetic diversity of their cranberry beds while increasing yields. `CNJ97-105-4` was originally selected from over 1,700 seedlings growing in cultivated test plotsin Chatsworth, N.J.

The American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is a temperate, woody perennial plant species native to North America. The United States is the largest cranberry producer, with Wisconsin and Massachusetts representing the majority of acreageand production, followed by New Jersey, Oregon and Washington. The cranberry industry relies on relatively few cranberry varieties, representing a narrow genetic base. These varieties are clonally-propagated and include selections from nativepopulations and first generation hybrids. Varieties selected from native cranberry populations, from as far back as 1850, are still being cultivated. The cultivars `Ben Lear` (unpatented) and `Early Black` (unpatented) are grown in significant acreage. First generation hybrid varieties were developed from one cycle of breeding and selection that was conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture, in cooperation with state Agricultural Experiment Stations in the 1940's. The USDA breedingprogram released a series of unpatented varieties in the 1950's including the most widely grown cultivar `Stevens` (unpatented), which was originally selected from test plots in Pemberton, N.J. The variety `#35` (unpatented) (a parent of CNJ97-105-4)also originated from this USDA breeding program and was acquired by some commercial entities. Recognized for its yield potential, `#35` (unpatented) was not widely accepted due to relatively poor fruit color development.

Varieties having high anthocyanin production along with consistently high productivity have become essential for commercial success in cranberry production. In addition, varieties having higher resistance to fruit rot are more suitable for fruitrot prone growing areas. Fruit crop productivity is a function of inherent differences among varieties for traits such as stolon vigor, upright density, inflorescence bud production, fruit set and fruit size. Varieties with high stolon vigor willestablish more rapidly and reduce the number of years required to achieve maximal production. However, after bed establishment, varieties must transition to optimal sexual reproduction mode, and optimal upright density, to achieve high crop production. Cranberry inflorescence bud primordia are set on uprights during the completion of the fruit development period and overwinter in a dormant state, before resuming growth the subsequent spring. Thus, the crop load of a given year, may impact thesubsequent year's crop, contributing to the pronounced biennial bearing habit common to many varieties. Productivity is also subject to environmental effects, e.g., heat and light intensity stresses, cold (frost) stress, water stress (drought andexcess), disease, insects and certain pesticides.

TAcy (total anthocyanin content) is currently a fruit quality component of processed cranberries, having a minimum acceptable value, as well as premiums for fruit with higher TAcy values. Cranberries from a given bed are measured for TAcycontent. TAcy is measured in terms of mg of anthocyanin per 100 g fruit using a standard spectrophotometric (520 nm) method. Earlier ripening varieties, which typically have higher TAcy, allow for earlier harvesting of a crop. Anthocyanin synthesisoccurs predominately in the fruit epidermis, resulting in a generally negative correlation between fruit size and TAcy. The Rutgers University cranberry breeding program quantitatively measured TAcy along with mean fruit size, and selected only thoseprogeny that were above the regression line representing the mean relationship between fruit size and TAcy.

New Jersey uniquely offers an ideal environment for cranberry breeding because of the climate, soils and water. Of all the cranberry production areas in North America, New Jersey conditions subject the cranberry to the highest disease pressureand heat stress. The plant must tolerate high heat stress and vegetative diseases during the growing season. Over 15 pathogens are known to incite cranberry fruit rot in New Jersey, and the fruit is also subject to heat scald and physiologicalbreakdown. Thus, selection under New Jersey conditions offers the best opportunity to identify varieties with higher resistance to disease, scald, and heat stress.

The Rutgers University cranberry breeding program, in Chatsworth, N.J., was initiated in 1985 to take advantage of this unique selection pressure. The program's methods were designed to duplicate, as much as possible, the environment of acommercial bed. Thus, breeding plots of 1.5 m.times.1.5 m were established with multiple plants and allowed to fill in to form a dense canopy. Two to four years after planting, yield of a given plot was evaluated over a four year minimum to provide forbiennial bearing assessment. Selection of parental material is critical; parental clones were selected based on their field phenotypic performance and crossed in various combinations in order to enhance traits and/or combine the most desirable traitsfrom both parents into one genotype, i.e., variety. Traits being evaluated in Rutgers University's cranberry breeding program include yield, fruit rot susceptibility/resistance, scald, stolon and upright vigor, total anthocyanin content (TAcy), solublesolids (Brix), and tiltratable acidity.

The new variety, `CNJ97-105-4`, resulted from crossing the variety `LeMunyon` (unpatented) as the seed parent, with the variety `#35` (unpatented) as the pollen parent. The plant was originally selected from a group of plants sexually derivedfrom the same parents as the new variety and that were grown in a field trial of over 1,700 seedlings derived from 57 cross combinations. The 1.5 m.times.1.5 m plots were planted in 1999 in Chatsworth, N.J. Results from this trial showed that`CNJ97-105-4` performed significantly better than standard varieties. In 2003, `CNJ97-105-4`, along with 76 other selections, was planted in a replicated trial with 3 m.times.3 m plots in Chatsworth, N.J. for additional evaluation. `CNJ97-105-4` wasalso planted in larger evaluation beds in 2004, in Browns Mills, N.J. (0.5 acres) and City Point, Wis. (1.0 acres) for evaluation in a larger scale environment.

`CNJ97-105-4` is a new cranberry variety selected under New Jersey's stressful conditions, which offers a unique germplasm background and the potential for rapid bed establishment and exceptionally high yields.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The `CNJ97-105-4` variety is distinguished from other cranberry varieties due to the following unique combination of characteristics: significantly higher yield, higher total anthocyanins, earlier flowering phenology, and greater vigor than `BenLear` (unpatented) and `Stevens` (unpatented) varieties.

`CNJ97-105-4` has been asexually reproduced by cuttings at the Marucci Center for Blueberry & Cranberry Research & Extension Center, Chatsworth, N.J. since 1999. Over that period, no evidence of off-types of `CNJ97-105-4` has been observed orreported. Thus, it is concluded that `CNJ97-105-4` is stable and reproduces true to type in successive generations of asexual reproduction.

The following detailed description concerns the variety `CNJ97-105-4`. The original plant and vegetative propagules have been observed growing in cultivated areas in Chatsworth and Browns Mills, N.J., and City Point, Wis. Certaincharacteristics of this variety, such as growth and color, may change with changing environmental conditions (such as light, temperature, moisture, nutrient availability, or other factors). Color descriptions and other terminology are used in accordancewith their ordinary dictionary descriptions, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Color designations are made with reference to the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS) Color Chart.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 compares `Stevens` (unpatented) fruit (on the left) with `CNJ97-105-4` fruit (on the right), harvested on Oct. 19, 2005 from the same cranberry bed in Chatsworth, N.J.

FIG. 2 shows the density of fruit and multiple fruits per upright on `CNJ97-105-4` plants, on Aug. 15, 2005, Chatsworth, N.J.

The colors of an illustration of this type may vary with lighting and other conditions under which conditions and, therefore, color characteristics of this new variety should be determined with reference to the observations described herein,rather than from these illustrations alone.

DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION

The following detailed description of the `CNJ97-105-4` variety is based on observations of plants growing in the field in Chatsworth, N.J. The characteristics of the variety were compared to `Stevens` (unpatented) and `Ben Lear` (unpatented),two of the most widely used cranberry varieties. The observed plantings were 1-6 years of age. Comparison to parents: `CNJ97-105-4` can be distinguished from its parents by its larger fruit size, higher yield and more vigorous plant growth. Inaddition, `CNJ97-105-4 has darker fruit` (higher total anthocyanins) than its pollen parent, #35. Scientific name: Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait. Parentage: Seed parent.--The variety `LeMunyon` (selected in 1960 from native New Jersey vines by NormalLeMunyon, Indian Mills, N.J.) (unpatented). Pollen parent.--The variety `#35` (derived from a `Howes`.times.`Searles` cross) (unpatented). Plant: Vigor.--In a replicated trial planted Jun. 16, 2003 and consisting of 80 advanced selections and standardvarieties, `CNJ97-105-4` had 35% cover after one year's growth, as compared to `Stevens` (unpatented) with 23% cover and `Ben Lear` (unpatented) with 28% cover (Jun. 21, 2004). General observations of `CNJ97-105-4` plantings indicate exceptional plantvigor. Growth habit.--Trailing shrub with very slender stems. Runner length.--Average runner length was 39.9 cm in a 2-yr. old field planting, as compared to `Stevens` (unpatented) at 32.3 cm and `Ben Lear` (unpatented) at 29.1 cm. Length of theUpright (vertical shoot arising from a stolon, commonly referred to as an Upright).--Average length was 9.6 cm, compared to 9.4 cm in `Stevens` (unpatented). Stem diameter.--1.5 mm at base of current year's growth, the same as `Stevens` (unpatented). Internodes.--Average internode length was about 8.9 mm on a 1-year old runner, compared to 7.5 mm in `Stevens` (unpatented). Productivity.--In established test plots in Chatsworth, N.J. `CNJ97-105-4` produced an average of 474 g of berries/sq. ft. (51 g/dm.sup.2) in comparison to `Stevens` (unpatented) yield of 285 g/sq. (31 g/dm.sup.2) (5-year averages, see Table 1). Hardiness.--Hardy in Zones 4-7 (from USDA Misc. Publ. 814). Disease resistance.--No disease resistance data available forfoliar or root pathogens. One of `CNJ97-105-4`s parents, `#35` (unpatented), has been noted to have some resistance to Phytophthora root rot. Leaves: The length, width and other measurements were obtained from observations of 20 typical fully developedleaves on Nov. 16, 2004 from plants of the new variety in a 6-yr. old field plot. Color was determined on actively growing plants. Texture.--Coriaceous (leathery). Length.--Average leaf length was 10.2 mm, with a range of 7.9-11.9 mm. Width.--Average leaf width was 4.2 mm, with a range of 3.6-5.1 mm. Shape.--Elliptic (2.4:1 ratio). Apex shape.--Rounded. Base shape.--Rounded, nearly sessile. Margin.--Entire, slightly revolute. Leaf color.--Upper leaf surface color ranges frombright green (RHS 143C) in new growth to deep green in mature leaves (RHS 139A). Lower leaf coloration.--Greyed-green (RHS 191A). Pubescence.--A small number of non-glandular trichomes found at tip and margins of leaf. Flowers: Size andshape.--Slender, nodding flowers on erect pedicels and in clusters of 3-9 flowers, corolla long-conic in bud, upon opening the petals are strongly reflexed and divided nearly to the base; typical open flower measuring about 10 mm across. Flowerdepth.--Because the petals are so strongly reflexed at anthesis, the flowers essentially have no "depth". Bud size and shape.--Conic in shape, 7.3 mm long by 2.9 mm wide. Petals.--4 petals per flower; narrow and revolute in shape, petals are 9.0 mmlong and 2.3 mm wide at the base, narrowing to a pointed apex, margins are smooth. Calyx.--The calyx consists of 4 fused sepals, and is 2 mm wide by 2.8 mm long. Color.--Unopened bud: deep pink (RHS 68C). Opened flower: pale pink (RHS 69A & 69B). Petals.--4 petals per flower; narrow and revolute in shape. Flowering phenology.--Bloom typically begins in late May and continues until late June depending on the season. `CNJ97-105-4` has an earlier flowering phenology, achieving 50% anthesis (bloom)on Jun. 19, 2003, Jun. 7, 2004, and Jun. 15, 2005, 3-5 days before `Stevens` (unpatented) each year. Mean number of flowers per upright.--5.4 flowers, compared to 4.9 in `Stevens` (unpatented). Mean number of flowers per ft.sup.2.--In 2004,`CNJ97-105-4` had an average of 706 flowers per ft.sup.2, compared to `Stevens` (unpatented) with 619 flowers per ft.sup.2. Fruit: Observations are from 30 typical fruit harvested from test plots in Chatsworth, N.J. on Oct. 10, 2004 (FIG. 1). Shape.--Widely elliptic, with rounded stem end and rounded calyx end. Size.--2.2 cm long and 1.7 cm wide. Skin.--Shiny, with little to no bloom. Flesh color.--White (RHS155c & 155d). Skin color.--Ranged from RHS 46B (red group) for the lightestberries, RHS 53A (red group) for medium berries, to RHS 187A (greyed-purple group) for the darkest. Stem pit.--Medium in width (1.2 mm) and barely indented (0.3 mm). Average weight.--Fruit collected yearly from 1 ft.sup.2 samples in test plots had anaverage weight of 2.2 g, similar to `Stevens` (unpatented) at 2.1 g (Table 2, five year mean). Number of seeds.--An average of 18 seeds per fruit, similar to `Stevens` (unpatented). Seed color.--Greyed-orange (RHS 165b & 166c). Fruit per upright.--3to 7 per cluster. Fruit chemistry.--100 g samples of fruit were harvested each year from test plots in Chatsworth, N.J. and evaluated for fruit chemistry. `CNJ97-105-4` had TAcy values averaging 100% greater than `Stevens` (unpatented) in Septemberand averaging 41% greater in October (Table 3, five year mean). `CNJ97-105-4` had Brix (% soluble solids) and titratable acidity values that were comparable to `Stevens` (unpatented): 7.9% vs. 8.1% Brix; and 2.3% vs. 2.4% titratable acidity. Fruitproduction.--First picking date in New Jersey was September 10, and last picking date was October 15. Average production was 474 g of berries/ft.sup.2 (51 g/dm.sup.2, equivalent to 456 barrels/acre), compared to `Stevens` (unpatented) yield of 285g/ft.sup.2 (5 yr. mean in NJ test plots, Table 1). Because fruit samples from `CNJ97-105-4` have almost the same average weight as `Stevens` (unpatented), the significantly higher yields of `CNJ97-105-4` are achieved largely from higher fruit density(FIG. 2). Usage.--Processing and fresh fruit. Fruit taste.--Slightly astringent and tart. Disease Resistance.--In New Jersey, in a trial where fungicides were used and disease pressure was severe, `CNJ97-105-4` had a 5-year average of 6.3% fruit rot(2001-2005), compared to 9.6% fruit rot in `Stevens` (unpatented).

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Yield of `CNJ97-105-4`, as compared to `Stevens` (unpatented), in a research trial established May 1999 in Chatsworth, NJ. Total yield, g/ft.sup.2 01-05 Cultivar 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 mean `CNJ97-105-4` 614 352 352 500606 474 `Stevens` 210 227 331 343 351 285

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Fruit weight of `CNJ97-105-4`, as compared to `Stevens` (unpatented), in a research trial established May 1999 in Chatsworth, NJ. Fruit wt., g/berry 01-05 Cultivar 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 mean `CNJ97-105-4` 2.1 2.1 2.32.1 2.2 2.2 `Stevens` 2.2 2.2 2.3 1.9 2.0 2.1

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Fruit color comparisons (total anthocyanins) of `CNJ97-105-4` and `Stevens` (unpatented) in a research trial established May 1999 in Chatsworth, NJ. TAcy (mg/100 g fruit) September Cultivar 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 mean`CNJ97-105-4` 12 34 13 20 10 18 `Stevens` 5 16 7 11 6 9 TAcy (mg/100 g fruit) October Cultivar 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 mean `CNJ97-105-4` 52 65 24 35 21 41 `Stevens` 37 44 28 29 11 29

* * * * *
 
 
  Recently Added Patents
Improving alignment target contrast in a lithographic double patterning process
Horizontal cable manager
Resist composition and method for producing resist pattern
Digital-to-analog converter and performing method thereof
Washing machine
Mobile terminal
White light emitting diode (LED) lighting device
  Randomly Featured Patents
Method of using physical buttons in association with a display to access and execute functions available through associated hardware and software
Portable hydraulic tester
Systems and methods for creating and evaluating content and predicting responses to content
Method and apparatus for creating and managing a visual representation of a portfolio and determining an efficient allocation
Dental floss holder
Beaucarnea plant named `FACH9901BEAU`
Water sensing alarm
Semiconductor integrated circuit
Units for building ornamental article
Compositions and methods for diagnosis and treatment of tumors