Resources Contact Us Home
Browse by: INVENTOR PATENT HOLDER PATENT NUMBER DATE
 
 
Ocular mask
D656526 Ocular mask
Patent Drawings:Drawing: D656526-10    Drawing: D656526-11    Drawing: D656526-12    Drawing: D656526-13    Drawing: D656526-14    Drawing: D656526-15    Drawing: D656526-16    Drawing: D656526-17    Drawing: D656526-18    Drawing: D656526-19    
« 1 2 3 »

(24 images)

Inventor: Christie, et al.
Date Issued: March 27, 2012
Application: D/350,008
Filed: November 10, 2009
Inventors: Christie; Bruce (Claremont, CA)
Peterson; Edward W. (Coto de Caza, CA)
van de Pol; Corina (Orange, CA)
Assignee: AcuFocus, Inc. (Irvine, CA)
Primary Examiner: Barkai; Raphael
Assistant Examiner: Gholson; Randall
Attorney Or Agent: Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP
U.S. Class: D16/101
Field Of Search: D16/101; D16/300; D16/301; D16/302; D16/303; D16/304; D16/305; D16/306; D16/307; D16/308; D16/309; D16/310; D16/311; D16/312; D16/313; D16/314; D16/315; D16/316; D16/317; D16/318; D16/319; D16/320; D16/321; D16/322; D16/323; D16/324; D16/325; D16/326; D16/327; D16/328; D16/329; D16/330; D16/331; D16/332; D16/333; D16/334; D16/335; D16/336; D16/337; D16/338; D16/339; D16/340; D16/341; D16/342; D29/109; D29/110; D24/110.2; 351/41; 351/44; 351/45; 351/46; 351/51; 351/52; 351/61; 351/62; 351/92; 351/103; 351/104; 351/105; 351/106; 351/107; 351/108; 351/109; 351/110; 351/111; 351/112; 351/113; 351/114; 351/115; 351/116; 351/117; 351/118; 351/119; 351/120; 351/121; 351/122; 351/123; 351/130; 351/140; 351/153; 351/158; 351/138; 2/13; 2/441; D21/483; D21/659; D21/660; D21/661
International Class: 1606
U.S Patent Documents:
Foreign Patent Documents: 41 34 320; 0 457 553; 369 993; 2599156; 2649605; 1 026 839; 1276003; 62167343; 03-001857; 04-158859; 07-178125; 07-265340; 1380743; WO 87/05797; WO 94/05232; WO 94/23327; WO 95/02356; WO 95/08135; WO 96/35397; WO 97/48004; WO 97/48005; WO 99/07309; WO 00/52516; WO 00/52516; WO 01/10641; WO 02/0027388; WO 02/102241; WO 03/030763; WO 2004/050132; WO 2004/105588; WO 2006/047698; WO 2008/036671
Other References: Accomodation and acuity under night-driving illumination levels. Arumi et al. Opthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 291-299, 1997. citedby other.
Accommodation and Presbyopia. Croft et al., International Opthalmology Clinics: Spring 2001, vol. 41, Issue 2, pp. 33-46. cited by other.
Accomodation dynamics as a function of age. Heron et al. Opthal. Physiol. Opt. 2002 22:389-396. cited by other.
Accommodation Responses and Ageing. Heron et al. IOVS, Nov. 1999, vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 2872-2883. cited by other.
Accommodative responses to anisoaccommodative targets. Koh et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 254-262, 1998. cited by other.
Accommodation responses to flickering stimuli. Chauhan et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 16. No. 5, pp. 391-408, 1996. cited by other.
Accommodation to perceived depth in stereo tests. Koh et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 279-284, 1998. cited by other.
Age Changes in the Interactions between the Accommodation and Vergence Systems. Heron et al. Optometry and Vision Science. vol. 78, No. 10, Oct. 2001. cited by other.
Anterior Ciliary Sclerotomy for Treatment of Presbyopia: A Prospective Controlled Study. Hamilton et al. Ophthalmology, vol. 109, No. 11: Nov. 2002: pp. 1970-1977. cited by other.
Binder et al., "Hydrogel keratophakia in non-human primates", Current Eye Research, vol. 1, No. 9, 1981/1982, pp. 535-542. cited by other.
Cao et al., "Comparative study of the use of poly(glycolic acid), calcium alginate and pluronics in the engineering of autologous porcine cartilage", Polymers for Tissue Engineering, pp. 315-327, VSP 1998. cited by other.
Can Accommodation be Surgically Restored in Human Presbyopia Glasser, Adrian. Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 76, No. 9, Sep. 1999. cited by other.
Changes in the static accommodation response with age. Kalsi et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 77-84, 2001. cited by other.
Choice of Spatial Frequency for Contrast Sensitivity Evaluation After Corneal Refractive Surgery. Montes-Mico et al. Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 17: Nov./Dec. 2001: pp. 646-651. cited by other.
Choyce, P. "Implants with Coloured and Opaque Portions: Implants with Built-In Stenopeic Aperture," Chapter 4, pp. 21-26 "Uniocular Aphakia Corrected by Anterior Chamber Implants with Built-In Stenipeic Aperture," Chapter 17, pp. 132-136, 1964.cited by other.
Clinical Characteristics of Lamellar Channel Deposits After Implementation of Intacs. Ruckhofer et al. J Cataract Refract Surg, vol. 26, Oct. 2000: pp. 1473-1479. cited by other.
Corneal Topography: The State of the Art, Alignment of Videokeratographs. Mandell et al. Chpt. 2, pp. 17-23, Jan. 1995. cited by other.
"Corneal Surgery" by L. Girard, The C.V. Mosby Publishing Company, London 1981 pp. 107-141. cited by other.
Dynamics of the accommodation response to abrupt changes in target vergence as a function of age. Heron et al. Vision Research 41 (2001) 507-519. cited by other.
Dynamic retinoscopy and accomodation. Whitefoot et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. vol. 12, Jan. 1992, pp. 8-17. cited by other.
Eduard Jaeger's Test-Types (Schrift-Scalen) and Historical Development of Vision Tests. Runge, Paul E. Tr. Am. Ophth. Soc. vol. 98, 2000: 375. cited by other.
Eight Years Experience with Permalens Intracorneal Lenses in Nonhuman Primates. Werblin et al. Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 8, Jan./Feb. 1992, pp. 12-21. cited by other.
"Epikeratophakia: Techniques, Compositions, and Clinical Results" by Werblin, Opthalmology, 1983, pp. 45-58. cited by other.
Errors in determining the direction of the visual axis in the presence of defocus. Atchison et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 463-467,1998. cited by other.
Evaluate surgical routine to determine DLK cause, surgeon advises. Piechocki, Michael. Ocular Surgery News: Refractive Surgery, Jan. 1, 2003: p. 14. cited by other.
Explanation for the observation of isogyres in crystalline lenses viewed between crossed polarizers. Opthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 13, Apr. 1993, pp. 209-211. cited by other.
Flap Measurements With the Hansatome Microkeratome. Spadea et al. Journal of Refractive Surgery, vol. 18, Mar./Apr. 2002: pp. 149-154. cited by other.
Focused and divided attention in stereoscopic deth. Wickens et al. SPIE, vol. 1256 Stereoscopic Displays and Applications (1990); pp. 28-34. cited by other.
Griffith et al.; "Functional Human Corneal Equivalents Constructed from Cell Lines", Science, vol. 286, Dec. 10, 1999 pp. 2169-2172. cited by other.
Groppi, J. J. "New Aspects in the Fitting of the Multi-Range Bifocal Contact Lens" Contacto, vol. 15:22-29 1971. cited by other.
Holes in Clear Lenses Demonstrate a Pinhole Effect. Zacharia et al. Arch Ophthalmol, vol. 106, Apr. 1988, pp. 511-513. cited by other.
Human Visual System--Image Formation, Encyclopedia of Imaging Science and Technology, Roorda, A., 2002, pp. 539-557. cited by other.
Hybrid diffractive-refractive achromatic spectacle lenses. Charman, W. N. Opthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 14, Oct. 1994: pp. 389-392. cited by other.
Iijima et al. "Formation of a spherical multicellular aggregate (spheroid) of animal cells in the pores of polyurethane foam as a cell culture substratum and its application to a hybrid artificial liver", Polymers for Tissue Engineering , pp.273-286, VSP 1998. cited by other.
Imaging in the 21st century. Charman, W. N. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 210-223,1998. cited by other.
Intraocular pressure after excimer laser myopic refractive surgery. Montes-Mico et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 228-235, 2001. cited by other.
Intrastromal Crystalline Deposits Following Hydrogel Keratophakia in Monkeys. Parks et al. Cornea 12(1): 29-34,1993. cited by other.
"Keratomileusis and Keratophakia in the Surgical Correction of Aphakia" by Barraquer, Cataract Surgery and Special Techniques, prior to 1996 pp. 270-289. cited by other.
"Lamellar Corneal Stromectomy for the Operative Treatment of Myopia" by Tadeusz Krwawicz, Notes, Cases, Instruments--1964, pp. 828-833. cited by other.
Lipid Deposits Posterior to Impermeable Intracornel Lenses in Rhesus Monkeys: Clinical, Histochemical, and Ultrastructural Studies. Rodrigues et al. Refractive & Corneal Surgery, vol. 6, Jan./Feb. 1990: DO. 32-37. cited by other.
Mastel Precision: Fiber Optic Ring Illuminator (Product Nos. 3776 & 4050) U.S. Patent No. 5312393 User Manual. Rev: A02: Jan. 11, 1995, pp. 1-25. cited by other.
Mastel Precision: The Ring Light. http://www.mastel.com/ring.sub.--light.html. Jul. 28, 2003. cited by other.
Measurement of the wave-front aberration of the eye by a fast psychophysical procedure. He et al. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, vol. 15, No. 9: Sep. 1998, pp. 2449-2455. cited by other.
Microstructural Changes in Polyester Biotextiles During Implantation in Humans. King et al. NC State University: JTATM, vol. 1, Issue 3, Spring 2001, pp. 1-8. cited by other.
Miller et al., Perspectives in Refraction: Quantification of the Pinhole Effect. Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 21, No. 4, Jan./Feb. 1977, pp. 347-350. cited by other.
Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia. Charman, W. N. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 126-133, 1999. cited by other.
New Visual Acuity Charts for Clinical Research. Ferris et al. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 94: 91-96, 1982. cited by other.
Night myopia and driving. Charman, W. N. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 16, No. 6, p. 474-485, 1996. cited by other.
Notch in contrast sensitivity function of optical origin: diffraction effects of acrylic filters. Irving et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 13, Apr. 1993: pp. 179-182. cited by other.
On modeling the causes of presbyopia. Glasser, A. Vision Research 41(2001) 3083-3087. cited by other.
On the linearity of accommodation dynamics. Charman, W. N. Vision Research 40 (2000) 2057-2066. cited by other.
Optical Aspects of Tolerances to Uncorrected Ocular Astigmatism. Charman et al. Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 70, No. 2: pp. 111-117, 1993. cited by other.
Optical Modeling of Contact Lens Performance Final Report Covering Period Jul. 15, 1994-Mar. 31, 1995. Grivenkamp et al. for Pilkington Barnes Hind, Issued Apr. 5, 1995. cited by other.
Optometric Clinical Practice Guideline Care of the Patient With Presbyopia: Reference Guide for Clinicians. Mancil et al. Mar. 20, 1998. cited by other.
PermaVision intracorneallens shows promise for hyperopia. Kronemyer, Bob. Ocular Surgery News: Jan. 1, 2003; p. 8. cited by other.
Sally Pobojewski, "New U-developed laser performs high-precision corneal surgery", News and Information Services, The University Record, Jul. 16, 1997. cited by other.
Poly(methyl methacrylate) model study of optical surface quality after excimer laser photo refractive keratectomy. Hauge et al. J Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 27, Dec. 2001, pp. 2026-2035. cited by other.
Procyon: Marketing Information for Distributors: Pupil Measurement and Refractive Sugery (Samples from Academic Papers 1994 and 2002). pp. 1-17. cited by other.
"Refractive Keratoplasty: Acute Morphologic Features," by Baumgarter et al, The CLAO Journal-Apr. 1985, vol. II, No. 2, pp. 163-169. cited by other.
Refractive keratoplasty with intrastromal hydrogel lenticular implants. McCarey et al. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. ScL, Jul. 1981, pp. 107-115. cited by other.
Retinal Image Quality in the Human Eye as a Function of the Accommodation. Lopex-Gil et al. Vision Research, vol. 38, No. 19, Jul. 3, 1998, pp. 1-11. cited by other.
Rosenbloom "The Controlled-Pupil Contact Lens in Low Vision Problems" Journal of the American Optometric Association, pp. 836, 838, 840 1969. cited by other.
Simple parametric model of the human ocular modulation transfer function, A. Deeley et al. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 11, Jan. 1991, pp. 91-93. cited by other.
Karin R. Slettin, MD et al., "An in Vivo Model of Femtosecond Laser Intrastromal Refractive Surgery", Experimental Science, Opthalmic Surgery and Lasers, Nov./Dec. 1999, vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 742-749. cited by other.
Subjective Depth-of-Focus of the Eye. Atchison et al. Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 74, No. 7, Jul. 1997, pp. 511-520. cited by other.
Subjective Sensitivity to Small Changes in the Contrast of a Suprathreshold Grating, The. Walsh et al. Vision Res., vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 163-193, 1990. cited by other.
Surface Modification Properties of Parylene for Medical Applications, The. Wolgemuth, Lonny.Business Briefing: Medical Device Manfacturing & Technology 2002, pp. 1-4. cited by other.
Surface tension control of collagen biomaterials by the selective hydrolysis of internal carboxyamides of the protein matrix. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Biomedica, v. 15, n. 1-2, p. 55-61, jan/ago 1999. cited by other.
Surgeon: Severe corneal lesions after Lasik are not stage 4 DLK. Piechocki, Michael. Ocular SurgeryNews; Jan. 1, 2003, pp. 16-17. cited by other.
Swinger et al., "Keratophakia and Keratomileusis--Clinical Results", American Academy of Opthalmology, Aug. 1981, vol. 88, No. 8, pp. 709-715. cited by other.
Takahashi, E. "Use and Interpretation of the Pinhole Test" The Optometric Weekly, pp. 83-86 1965. cited by other.
Theoretical and practical performance of a concentric bifocal intraocular implant lens. Charman, W.N. Vision Research 38 (1998) 2841-2853. cited by other.
Use of a digital infrared pupillometer to assess patient suitability for refractive surgery. Rosen et al. J Cataract Refract Surg., vol. 28: Aug. 2002. pp. 1433-1438. cited by other.
Vision and driving--a literature review and commentary. Charman, W.N. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt., vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 371-391, 1997. cited by other.
Wesley, N. K. "Research on the Multi-Range Lens," pp. 18-24, 1970. cited by other.
Yamauchi et al., "Cultivation of fibroblast cells on keratin coated substrata", Polymers for Tissue Engineering, pp. 329-340, VS 1998. cited by other.









Abstract:
Claim: CLAIM The ornamental designs for an ocular mask, as shown and described.
Description: FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of an embodiment of an ocular mask according to the present designs;

FIG. 2 is a bottom perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a top-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a bottom-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a front elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 6 is a rear elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 7 is a left-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 8 is a right-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 3 taken through line 9-9 of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 3 taken through line 10-10 of the embodiment of FIG. 1;

FIG. 11 is a top perspective view of a second embodiment of an ocular mask according to the present designs;

FIG. 12 is a bottom perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 13 is a top-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 14 is a bottom-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 15 is a front elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 16 is a rear elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 17 is a left-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 18 is a right-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 19 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 13 taken through line 19-19 of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 20 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 13 taken through line 20-20 of the embodiment of FIG. 11;

FIG. 21 is a top perspective view of a third embodiment of an ocular mask according to the present designs;

FIG. 22 is a bottom perspective view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 23 is a top-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 24 is a bottom-plan view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 25 is a front elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 26 is a rear elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 27 is a left-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 28 is a right-side elevational view of the embodiment of FIG. 21;

FIG. 29 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 23 taken through line 29-29 of the embodiment of FIG. 21; and,

FIG. 30 is a cross-sectional view of FIG. 23 taken through line 30-30 of the embodiment of FIG. 21.

The broken lines shown in FIGS. 11-20 are included for the purpose of illustration only and form no part of the claimed design.

* * * * *
 
 
  Recently Added Patents
Image forming apparatus and display method for displaying different component information based on a type of user of the image forming apparatus
Device profile assignment based on device capabilities
Using parallel processing constructs and dynamically allocating program portions
Method and apparatus of controlling uplink transmission power
Method of anonymous entity authentication using group-based anonymous signatures
Fast uplink response to downlink shared channel transmission without a dedicated uplink channel
Trim bead for a building wall
  Randomly Featured Patents
Double-chuck mechanical pencil
Fluid sterilization apparatus
Electric meter for mounting with a standard watthour meter
Secure optical-fiber communication system
Lower leg orthosis apparatus
Turbine engine with semi-fixed turbine driving a receiver controlled so as to preserve a roughly constant rotation speed
SNMP firewall for network identification
Ceramic packing element
Access port using shape altering anchor
Coin escalator